Skip to content

Janosch Troehler

Editor

Edition #103

Today, we recommend the new songs by Moonpools, Evelinn Trouble, Tom Silkman, Chiara Dubey, and Laura Carbone.

This content is for Members

Subscribe

Already have an account? Log in

Exclusive Premiere: Karim G – Moving On

«Moving On», the new single by multi-instrumentalist Karim G celebrates its premiere with Negative White today. It is a stunning track.

From the start, there is an intriguing slowness to Moving On as if Karim G just refuses to accept the inevitable. And yet, there is also a peaceful, almost lovely melody, which indicates quite the opposite: acceptance.

Karim Gandouli is a phenomenon. A multi-instrumentalist who began his project, Karim G, in Spring 2020 during the first wave of the pandemic as an emotional valve. Gandouli writes and records everything independently, yet the band remains a crucial collaborative effort to bring his songs onto the stage. But first and foremost, the only 21-year-old artist sounds as if he has written and performed music for decades by now.

In May 2022, Karim G released 2o, a brooding volcano of creativity, mixing different languages and facets, held together by a raw yet refined sound that takes the best of pop and shoegaze.

This mesmerizing fusion is omnipresent in Moving On, an ambassador for Karim G's upcoming opus, Echoes of Ephemera, which is officially released tomorrow.

I feel like moving on
The past is like a stone
That makes me drown and sink
If I could only think
Of something less absurd
To make sure that I’m heard
For time flies by so fast
Why cannot one thing last?

The song starts simply, and in some sense, remains that way, even if it Karim G builds the composition up to a towering, monumental catharsis towards the end. But simplicity is no insult here, rather it represents a resourcefulness, a cunning effectiveness in the way Moving On operates.

Lyrically, Karim G leaves room for interpretation: Is it a lost love? Or the death of a close person? And he leaves room to contemplate over the song's message; nothing that punches you in the face with explicity, more tranquil invitation to reflect in this eclectic soundscape. And maybe, just maybe, find resolve.

For a while you made me smile
Now I know, you had to go

It is highly refreshing to hear a song like Moving On. A song that takes its time, does not rush to deliver its message, does not stuff its composition with unnecessary frippery. Moving On is a true gem of artistic thought and execution, a triumphant hymn to expression over conformity.

Photo: Claude Göbeli

Edition #102

Today, we recommend the new songs by Holy Esque, Nola Kin, vega vi, Tanlines, and Millie Turner.

This content is for Members

Subscribe

Already have an account? Log in

More AI-generated Fake Albums On Spotify Discovered

More AI-generated fake albums appear on Spotify. The problem seems to grow in size.

Last week, Negative White reported on an incident where unknown scam artists uploaded an AI-generated album in the name of Swiss rock trio Bell Baronets. Since then, the story has been picked up by Swiss magazine Beobachter.

But also, more fake album uploads have been reported. Another Swiss band, Basement Saints, came forward. Like with Bell Baronets, the album has been removed from their profile but lives on in a namesake artist profile, hurting their search results on Spotify.

Today, an album has been uploaded to the profile of Mama Jefferson, another Swiss rock band. However, the band is currently on a hiatus since the previous singer, Vanja Vukelic, emigrated from Switzerland.

Are you an artist and were also affected by a fake upload?
We want to hear from you. Contact us via hello@negativewhite.com.

Bell Baronets’ Silvan Gerhard, who is also a member of Mama Jefferson, confirmed to Negative White last week that the band remains currently on a break.

AI Increases A Known Problem

As the New York Times wrote several days ago: «For $20, artists can buy an annual subscription to a music distributor, a company that can instantly post songs to dozens of streaming platforms.» And further: «Some marketers have been caught trying to juice the profile of legitimate artists, usually with “bot farms” programmed to play songs on repeat. More often, though, scammers simply create white noise tracks or A.I.-generated tunes on their computers.»

The scheme of abusing the lacklustre verification process between aggregators and streaming platforms we described last week is also a long-known problem. Already in 2019, Pitchfork reported on the issue—including the typical empty corporate statements by both aggregator companies like DistroKid and streaming platforms (DSPs) like Spotify.

However, today’s generative AI tools enhance the problem’s severity: Songs and albums are created within minutes. Last year, Spotify reportedly removed «tens of thousands» of songs from the platform.

How You Spot Fake Albums

AI-generated albums and fake artists are still quite easy to detect. Here are some dead giveaways:

  • The cover has an AI-generated aesthetic that probably differs significantly from the band’s previous visual language.
  • The album appears suddenly without announcement. While surprise album drops can happen, they are the exception. Most artists will tease their albums with singles and social media posts.
  • The songs sound either vastly different, even being a different genre, or the production quality and mix are not on the level with previous real recordings.
  • AI fakes uploaded to fake artist profiles can be spotted by checking the artist’s profile. The biography is either empty or ChatGPT-produced emptiness. Social media profiles or photos are missing.

Trust Will Fade

Since we are dealing with a loophole that has been publicly known for years, one might wonder why aggregators and DSPs couldn’t put guardrails in place. Technically, it wouldn’t be a significant challenge.

But they don’t seem to care enough, and why would they? Whether it’s a legitimate upload or not, they take a cut of the money anyway. And if the fake uploads primarily affect bands operating under the radar, their reputation won’t take a blow, and legal ramifications are highly unlikely.

AI-generated music will undoubtedly become the music business’ biggest challenge in 2024. Dealing with emerging problems like these fake uploads should be a top priority. Otherwise, musicians must ask themselves why they should invest time and money to build their brands only to be abused by scammers who profit from their efforts.

Keep Dancing Inc. – A Taste of Possibility

French trio Keep Dancing Inc.'s second album, «A Taste of Possibilty», features ten promising songs but fails to create sonic cohesiveness.

What is an album worth in the age of streaming and playlist domination? The Parisian trio Keep Dancing Inc. released their sophomore album—A Taste of Possibility—and it might provide one potential answer to that question.

Louis de Marliave, Joseph Signoret, and Gabrielle Cressaux initially found each other through a shared love for acts like «LCD Soundsystem, Depeche Mode, and Palma Violets,» as de Marliave states in the album’s press release. Adding in a constant fascination for synthesizers, the Beatles’ harmonies, and electronic formations like New Order and Hot Chip, the trio’s sound is easily deciphered.

Entering the public spotlight with their debut album Embrace in 2020, the dance-pop band followed with an array of singles—as it is best practice today—culminating in the EP Can’ttrio’s Get You Out Of My Mind that features four out of the ten tracks on A Taste of Possibility.

Recorded during the pandemic’s height, the process differed from before: «We were working with a more stripped-back sound of just a synth, guitar and drums and found that we were much tighter as a band,» states bassist Joseph Signoret.

But it wasn’t just the songwriting process or the live recording that challenged Keep Dancing Inc. The trio embarked on entirely self-producing the record. The band’s collaborative spirit meant that everyone could pitch in: «Everyone brings ideas to the table that we work on together,» explains Signoret further in the press release.

Keep Shifting Inc.

All this information sets the backdrop for listening to A Taste of Possibility. And it seems the album’s title is already engraved as a prophecy for what to expect. Keep Dancing Inc., so the perception, took the possibilities quite literally and explored their sound in all directions.

It starts with 96, an eclectic instrumental track featuring heavy guitar work, fuzzy bass lines, and playful synth melodies, pulling back the curtain of what Keep Dancing Inc.’s sound entails. There’s just enough jam session flavour and drive to create something intriguing.

From there, we arrive at A Taste of Possibility, the album’s namesake song. To say that it sounds different from the opener would be a gross understatement. We are greeted by summer-warm pop, refined with a pinch of funk. It is an almost unbearably happy sound.

And the sound keeps shifting colours from there on out like a hyperactive chameleon: Murders Mourns Again, criticizing Western hypocrisy, is a fast-paced rock sound, housing a bit of surf vibe and post-punk ambience.

Followed by the slowly building synth-pop in Chinese Town, we arrive at the mellow Can’talbum’s Get You Out Of My Mind—a reflection of long-distance relationship and isolation, and the acoustic-guitar-dominated You’reCan’t My Healthiest Addiction.

GPS then throws another wrench with its garage sound—inspired by Let the Beat Hit’You’re Em by Tru Faith. The admittedly funny ballad Pollination Nation Invasion, telling us about the first time experiencing hay fever, is followed by the building pop composition in Tell Me Again, while Radio, the album’s most straightforward rock song, concludes A Taste of Possibility.

Individually Great—But Not Cohesive Enough

There is something exciting about artists willing to branch out, explore different styles, and chart untrampled routes through the sonic jungle. Nobody who truly cares about music wants an album with ten copy-pasted songs.

But with A Taste of Possibility, Keep Dancing Inc. unfortunately went too far with the concept of variability. The album feels disjointed, only held together by an underlying story of creation and first times for the band itself—a story that remains ominous to the uninitiated. It is simply not enough to throw a bunch of singles together and call it an album… even with the premise of that title. There must be an apparent thread and maybe even a sense of direction.

However harsh the criticism might be that Keep Dancing Inc. shot miles past the idea of an album, it is by no means a criticism of their songs individually. Individually, they are great, each in their own regard.

One might enjoy the overwhelming happiness and retro-pop vibe in A Taste of Possibility or Chinese Town. Others may find the instrumental opus 96 or the post-punkish Murderer Mourns Again, easily the album’s best tracks, an incentive to listen.

The album’s overdone variability means that many might find one or two tracks they like—and forget about the rest. And it ultimately remains sad that Keep Dancing Inc.’s second album—after a promising and cohesive picture provided in Embrace—went overboard with their sonic kaleidoscope.

Maybe At The Crossroads

You can now argue that today’s world doesn’t need cohesiveness anymore. Who even cares about albums when playlists are the main driver for music discovery? And I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with you. In such a world, it makes sense to create bolder variety.

But then, there’s no need for an album anymore: You gain more attention by steadily releasing singles throughout the year. However, Keep Dancing Inc. decided to bundle the songs nonetheless.

On the other hand, we can give this a positive spin: Maybe we see A Taste of Possibility in hindsight as an album that was searching for the future—heavily impacted by the departure of a former band member, the pandemic, and an urge to experiment. Keep Dancing Inc. states that the album feels like «a big milestone» in their careers.

Each of the record’s songs provides a potential outlook on where the band might be heading. «We’re already thinking about what’s next now, like maybe developing a more minimalist sound for the dancefloor. But for now, we’re just happy to continue defining what Keep Dancing Inc. is all about.»

With the best of intentions, you could see it as a canvas full of promising ideas. And as a cliffhanger for the band’s further adventures.

Keep Dancing Inc. – A Taste Of Possibility

Release: January 26, 2024

Edition #101

Today, we recommend the new songs by Linn Koch-Emmery, THYMIAN, Brother Bird, Junes, and the einsamkeit.

This content is for Members

Subscribe

Already have an account? Log in

Swiss Band Becomes Victim of AI Scam

Bell Baronets suddenly found that they'd released a new EP. The problem: It's not theirs. What happened?

Bell Baronets are an independent rock band from Switzerland. The trio around guitarist Silvan Gerhard has been releasing music for over a decade—with the EP Mount Yeast Tapes (Side B) being their latest in 2022. They are a small band with currently 574 monthly listeners on Spotify.

However, a new EP suddenly appeared on Spotify and other streaming services. I Will Not Surrender with six new songs. Fans might have been excited, but there's a problem: It's not Bell Baronets.

«My brother wrote me because he had it in his Release Radar on Spotify,» Gerhard tells Negative White over the phone. «At first, I definitely was perplexed and also angry, but the more I think about it, the more I can laugh.» He made the fake EP public on the band's social media profiles.

«I thought the EP got accidentally attributed to us, but then I listened to the songs, and it felt odd. It sounds like us, but not quite. The mix is pretty whack. The voice sounds different in every song,» Gerhard explains. After that, he suspected that it was AI-generated music.

So what happened exactly?

How The Scam Works

A combination of criminal energy and lacklustre controls enabled this fake EP to arrive at Bell Baronets' profiles. The ingredients for the scam are simple: Anyone can sign up for an aggregator like DistroKid. Aggregators act as interfaces to various streaming services like Spotify and ease the digital distribution for artists.

However, you can also attribute your uploaded music to any artist you like on these aggregators. Streaming services and aggregators assume that people naturally want to upload to their profiles.

🤝
Excuse the interruption, but we need your help. Negative White is an independent platform supported by members like you. With your premium membership, you're keeping us alive. Start here.

But how do they get the money?

One would think uploading fake songs to another artist's profile is useless since the money would go to said artists. That's wrong in the case of aggregators since streaming services pay the aggregators, who then pay the people who uploaded the music. And that is, in the case of Bell Baronets, not them.

There is no check from aggregators or most streaming services if the upload, and by extension, the payout for those, are legitimate. These insufficient checks open the doors for scammers who probably deploy their scheme with thousands of artists to make it profitable.

Gerhard mentions that the EP wasn't uploaded to Apple Music as their upload policy is more strict.

Silvan Gerhard (middle) talked us through what happened. Photo: Promo

«We Won't Be The Last Ones»

For Silvan Gerhard, it comes as little surprise that Bell Baronets were used for the scam. He reckons that the people behind it specifically target smaller bands because it's less likely to be discovered, and legal ramifications are unlikely. «We definitely won't be the last ones where this happens.»

«The insane thing is that I can't get these songs deleted easily,» he explains. It would require a lot of legal trouble, which Bell Baronets can not afford. Although the fake EP has meanwhile vanished from their artist's page on Spotify and moved to a new artist with the same name, there's still continuous damage. If you search for Bell Baronets, the fake songs are the first results.

Here's an actual song by Bell Baronets.

«The whole AI thing is scary, but our example also shows that it's currently not possible to generate an entire EP with any sort of consistency,» Gerhard states. But he admits that it adds challenge for independent artists. According to his distributor, the AI-powered scams are also top-of-mind with Impala, the European indie association. He hopes there will be a solution soon.

📚 Recommended Reads

While the incident is a nuisance for Silvan Gerhard, who earns his living as a session and live guitarist for several Swiss bands, he took the bull by its horns. He turned it into a good marketing opportunity and simultaneously raised awareness for the issues of AI music scams.

Pitchfork Will Be Integrated With GQ Magazine

Publisher Condé Nast announced drastic changes at music website Pitchfork.

According to a post on Threads by Maxwell Tani, media reporter at Semafor, the publishing house Condé Nast plans to move the music website Pitchfork under GQ.

Tani posted a screenshot, apparently showing the note to Pitchfork's staff by Anna Wintour, Condé Nast's Chief Content Officer:

Today we are evolving our Pitchfork team structure by bringing the team into the GQ organization. This decision was made after a careful evaluation of Pitchfork's performance and what we believe is the best path forward for the brand so that our coverage of music can continue to thrive within the company.

The note further indicates that the current editor, Puja Patel, will also leave the company. She replaced the site's founder, Ryan Schreiber, in 2018. According to the New York Times, Condé Nast declined to comment on how many employees will lose their jobs.

Blog Turned Corporate

The origins of Pitchfork date back to 1996 when Ryan Schreiber created the website. The early music blog grew significantly and became a landmark in online music journalism—even organising their own music festivals starting in 2005.

In October 2015, Condé Nast, the publisher of magazines like Vogue, Wired, and The New Yorker. It is unknown how much Condé Nast paid for the acquisition. However, Fred Santarpia, the publisher's chief digital officer then, said: «Pitchfork is profitable, and it boasts a thriving live events business, with events in Chicago and Paris, and robust video offerings — both vital and growing parts of the publishing business.»

Pitchfork's acquisition was the last stepping stone of a blog that reached the heights of the corporate publishing world. Around the same time, other digital media offsprings like Vice or Buzzfeed saw their glory days.

Continuous Decline

In recent months and years, all these former blog echelons saw a critical decline. Vice filed for bankruptcy last year, Buzzfeed shut down its news division, and now Pitchfork becomes the latest poster child to see what is probably its downfall.

Although Pitchfork's advertising page still boasts that the site reaches a «loyal audience of more than 7 million monthly unique visitors», the accuracy of this number is likely low as the information has not changed since 2016.

Wintour's note unveils apparent problems through the corporate phrase «a careful evaluation of Pitchfork's performance,» which translates to a failing business model.

Unclear Future

What the folding of Pitchfork's staff into GQ means for the brand is yet to be clarified. Will it disappear or remain a standalone website? So far, no information has been provided that answers this question.

However, the news is again a clear indication that music journalism in its current form can not survive in the corporate world with an advertising-based business model. While titles like Rolling Stone Magazine can still feed off the nostalgia factor, online magazines seem to struggle much more.